The conversation, conclusion

Okay, doesn’t nothingness define non-existence?
More or less, that’s what I’ve been saying, God is nothing
But then to believe in nothing, would be a non-existent hypothesis.
Exactly what I’m telling you. God doesn’t exist he is nothing, what part of that don’t you understand?
We have already established your belief in God now it’s just a matter of your acceptance of Jesus as Lord and Savior, but we are showing now that atheism does not exist.
Yeah but now I’ve got you, because by your own argument if a thought is something and something exists then I have thought about it and I believe that atheism does exist, so now what do you have to say?
But your belief tells you to believe in nothing, nothingness is an inconceivable concept. Remember even in nothing there is something, so I don’t understand how a belief in nothing can be upheld.
It’s not really a belief in nothing; it’s a belief in no God.
We have already established however your belief in God, so how can that be a belief? Your belief structure has a flaw. If you would like to fix that we could discuss how you might find salvation through belief in Jesus Christ.
No thanks.
You don’t want to know the truth?
I know the truth I know what I believe.
So you are then assured of salvation?
I don’t know nothing about that, but I do know that what I believe is the truth to me.
So truth is relative then? Is that what you are saying?
Yeah, you know everybody has there own perception of what is true.
Wow it would be great if the law worked like that, no your honor that is not one of my laws so I can’t be charged with it.
Now you’re talking.
So I’m not really sure if you are an anarchist or a relativist. Do you know?
I’m hopeless
We all are that’s why we need Jesus that’s why he paid the price for our sins that’s why we can’t do it on our own. I’ve got to get going, you have a great day and may God bless you
You too